Massively^™

Oh yeah? well you're still a poopiehead and I'm telling mom.



j/k. If it holds more than 100 people at a time online then I want to hear about it on massively :P Don't let the griefers get to you, thats the whole point of the comments section is to moan.

Reply

I have to say that the volume of SL coverage here is unusual when mixed in with titles which are more towards the gaming end of the spectrum, but when you step back and take a look at "virtual world" space and where it's going, it seems to me that the future is less about pure gaming, and more about larger, all inclusive experiences which incorporate gaming with more casual opportunities.

Unfortunately, it's suffering from the "Wii Effect": experiences like SL CAN appeal to both gamers and non-gamers, but MMO games tend to attract gamers; it's not a two-way street, and the MMO gamers tend to thumb their nose at SL and it's ilk for whatever reason. The same with the Wii: "hardcore" gamers complain that the Wii is "dumbing down" the past-time, yet the Wii is bringing more and more people INTO the gaming lifestyle. In both cases, it's good to get more people onboard so they can understand firsthand, rather then allow politicians and other fear-mongers to write their opinions for them.

Reply

This is all Im saying:

#1 Second Life = 229
#2 WoW = 128
#3 LotRO = 85

I appreciate Secondlife as much as the next guy, but I would appreciate the "Secondlife-Free homepage" more.

Heck, I would still like SL news when new features come out, records broken, and the such, just not hourly updates.

Reply

Things were a lot better when we had the Second Life Insider. Back then we didn't have to deal with Whiny MMO Kids.

Now, if WoW was restricted to 18+, maybe I'd give it a try. But I deal with kids every day of my life already.

Reply

I think it would be reasonable for Massively to say "You want more traditional MMO coverage? Then put in an application to write for us." That way, people inclined to like Massive, "if only," could help make it better.

Reply

While I have no issue with Second Life coverage, it does have an obscene amount of content here...enough that it's made me consider unsubscribing from the RSS feed. Just to the right I can see 231 stories for Second Life, and the next runner up is WOW at 129. That's a huge difference for a game that is not producing near the numbers of WOW.

Are numbers the only factor in reporting? No...but they need to be a factor. Half the time I think I've stumbled into Second Life Insider by mistake. It's too much...scale it back. Just taking yesterday's articles on SL, I see a Yesterday's Money which includes other MMOG (good) but then a Yesterday In Second Life, which has some of the most useless information in a post. Get rid of it...Do a yesterday on Massively and give SL it's own section and you got a winner.

Simon says no to settlement was a horrible article. I had to search Google to find out what was being fought over because your article did not provide any background information.

Going back further you have Linden Labs moving to an office...riveting if you're in real estate, otherwise who cares? So there's 3 articles in 2 days that are either badly written or completely useless.

You're serving a broader market than Second Life, and the general opinion of most people I talk to is Second Life (unless they're regular players or investors). Realize that and try to pimp up some of the MMOs few people talk about. If we wanted this amount of Second Life news, Second Life Insider would still be the place to put it.

It's not like WOW Insider has gone away, right?

Reply

I agree with the sentiments above, I don't mind SL'ers for all the hyped up POS it is, I don't mind reporting on it but the fact you have to defend it's use in the MMO website it must be the fact that some think that the PR drive of the game makers is just sickening sometimes.

The mass PR drive is what turned me away from SL in the first place, it's kinda like the Dot com boom/bust thing, it was touted as the next biggest thing ... and collapsed over night. And with the dot.com business it's built up over 6-7 years to become stronger than whole industries put together. Which is what I would imagine SL or some other copycat-done-better will end up achieving.

Lets face it, SL is slow horridly planned and programmed even on the best systems out there it slow and horrid to use. Once someone with some decent knowledge on how to program an engine that 'can' cope with that amounts of information I think it will take off with allot more zeal than SL ever had.

"#1 Second Life = 229
#2 WoW = 128
#3 LotRO = 85"

I think that's the general point, too much of one game not enough of others, I mean who cares how much they traded? It's just reposted from another site, and like others in this comments section I've considered unsubbing because of the amount of SL BS I have to put up with to get to the real stories (which are usually a good read).

Reply

I am glad you have the coverage of Second Life. I have tried it a couple times and I am trying it again because of your coverage. I have gotten into the game much more than any other time I have tried it and met some really cool people. It's something to do to have a good time when you're waiting for a download or only have 30 minutes or so to play. I pop into SL have a couple interesting conversations with complete strangers and pop out again. It's a nice social fix.

Reply

Well on one point, all of these blogs used to be individual sites owned by AOL and were rolled up into one huge megablog at their discretion, if I understand the launch correctly.

So you have all of these people who were writing for their respective sites before, and continue to do so now under a different domain name.

Also if I understand it correctly, there doesn't seem to be much divvying-out of articles. What I mean by that is I see that some of the people who used to write for SLInsider still only writing SL stuff, whereas some of them are also writing WoW stuff and CoH stuff and so forth. Which strikes me as authors electing their own subjects to report on.

Meaning if you want to whine, don't make your focus on SL not belonging here (and given that SLInsider was an AOL property previously, as Massively is now, they obviously felt it belongs here even if you don't) and don't complain about SL having too much "focus," and complain that the people who cover the other MMOGs you like aren't being as prolific as the SL people. Since it strikes me as everyone covers what they want to cover, therein lies the issue.

Reply

Along with most of the others here, I'm just curious about the amount of Second Life coverage vis a vis other games. I'm also *somewhat* curious about the WoW coverage since this blog-group contains WoWInsider. But OTOH I get that you can't assume that everone reads that.

I'd love to see other games get more coverage, personally.

Reply

Like Gr1zz said, if it was my MMO I'd be happy to see this much coverage. And for what this site is trying to do, too much is better then having too little.

Maybe an answer could be having two priority to articles, One for front page news, another for after the fold (to put it in newspaper terms).

You could do what slashdot does, some articles are listed in full but some are simple one line titles that direct you to the full story.

Reply

I certainly think one should aim for balance across the various worlds and games that are reported on. If SL ends up getting ten times the coverage of anything else things would certainly seem to be somewhat unabalanced.

However I'm absolutely certain SL should be here. Game spaces like WoW have established their place, building on the shoulders of previous giants, and whilst SL is different I'm confident it is part of a growing trend towards less game oriented virtual worlds that will soon be ubiquitous. And when they are, I wouldn't be surprised to find any number of games directly embedded within these socials worlds .ie. the worlds acting as portals to games as well as being self-contained playspaces of their own.

Reply