How would a Starcraft MMO work?
Filed under: World of Warcraft, Sci-fi, Game mechanics, New titles, PvP, Opinion, Races, Rumors
Speculation over Blizzard's upcoming MMO continues unabated, even with the lack of anything new to feed upon. The biggest hope, I dare to say, is that it's going to be Starcraft that gets the treatment, even if it's still a long way away from release. Starcraft holds fast in many gamers' hearts, including mine, so it's only natural to want more. But when actually considering the possibility, how would it play out?Our Krystalle has already given this a glance over on WoW Insider, and our recent Ask Massively asked a similar question, but I'd like to take it deeper. Let's take World of Warcraft as a point of comparison and see if we can run down this mythical beast.
The Name Game
First of all, I don't imagine it would be 'World of Starcraft'. It's a sweeping saga set against the backdrop of limitless space! Maybe 'Galaxy of Starcraft' or 'Universe of Starcraft' is closer, but they don't have quite the right ring to them. And even if it were a single world, which world? Char? Aiur? Korhal? Here's where we can begin to make the WoW comparisons in earnest.
WoW contains 2 factions, with 5 races each. Conversely, Starcraft has 3 factions, and each one is its own race. Each race has its own starting area, which in general terms is its homeland (caveats about the Draenei aside). So, we might assume that if you get the option of picking your character among Starcraft's 3 races, their starting areas will be their homeworlds. For visibility's sake, let's let the Zerg have Char, the Protoss get Aiur, and the Terrans start on Korhal.
In a class of its own
There are 9 character classes in WoW, and this is where it gets a bit tricky. Depending on how you look at the hierarchical structure of units in Starcraft, the total number of classes is a bit harder to calculate. Each race has its own specialized units, and they're not shared between factions, the way many classes are in WoW. For instance, the Terrans have Marines, Firebats, Vultures, Goliaths, and many others. It doesn't seem feasible to consider these playable classes, especially when taking into account the entirely mechanical nature of some of these units. The Zerg and Protoss have similarly unique units to themselves.
So, when you create your character, what choices would you have? Continuing along the Terran line, let's say you start off as a basic Private. You could choose to specialize in either Infantry, which allows access to the Marine, Firebat, Medic, and Ghost classes; the Ground Vehicle set, which includes the Vulture, Goliath, and Siege Tank classes; or the Air Vehicle set, which gives you the Banshee, Wraith, Dropship, Valkyrie, Battlecruiser, and Science Vessel. I'm deliberately leaving out the SCV, as WoW doesn't let you play as any of the resource-gathering units from the Warcraft series.
Looking at this wide variety of classes to play, it seems obvious that a great way to make this work is to allow players to pursue one path at a time. For instance, let's say you wanted to fly. You could start off learning the Banshee, getting upgrades during your tour of duty, then perhaps once you'd earned enough flight time, move on to the Valkyrie, then to the Wraith, and finally to the Battlecruiser. It would be a simple progression from least to most powerful. The same system would allow you to pursue the other two paths, and you could probably choose to switch between them at any time, with a corresponding point penalty for switching horses mid-stream.
The craziest org chart in history
Further, the Terrans, being a military organization, have their own hierarchy of rank. On a purely leveling basis, your rank could be tied to your combat experience, with your class level being a separate metric. Higher ranks confer greater HP, perhaps access to more sensitive, 'need to know' areas, and the ability to command more units beneath your rank, though that might only be practical in PvP arenas.
But again, would this structure work with the other 2 races? The Protoss have a somewhat similar organization, but the Zerg are a hive mind, each unit controlled by its Cerebrate. Compare this to the loosely-structured WoW, where rank is merely enforced through greater levels, and we begin to see some issues arise. It's conceivable that rank among units might be dismissed entirely for the sake of gameplay. Let's not worry about that right now.
However, unit balance is something that does need to be considered. In the original Starcraft, you frequently saw a single Protoss Zealot take fire from numerous Marines without immediately falling. Obviously, this won't work in an MMO setting. Thinking of one-to-one interaction, though, would our hypothetical MMO have leveling combat like WoW, which means random enemies wandering around an area just waiting to be taken down? That's always an option, but within the context of the overarching story, would it make sense for a Terran Private to be let loose in the wild just to do some hunting? I'd hate to see this, but it's possible for the Terrans to create a 'holodeck' for training purposes. This could allow for worry-free leveling up, but as an artificial method, it instantly drops suspension of disbelief.
Such conceits make more sense with the Protoss and Zerg. The Zerg are a ravenous race, with 'Survival of the Fittest' being their unspoken motto. It's not much of a stretch to assume they'd wander around fighting and devouring anything they could. Similarly, the Protoss could require its warriors to go on rites of passage, a 'blooding' being necessary for inclusion in the tribe. But the whole reason you sign up for a Starcraft MMO is to battle the other two races. So how do we let a new user jump right into the action?
Player vs Player vs Player
Perhaps it's here that Blizzard would differentiate its two flagship titles. The Starcraft MMO could be all about PvP within a larger group, no soloing possible. This is, arguably, what MMOs are all about, after all -- the shared experience. And by this time, WoW players have learned how to create teams, have learned which strategies work and which don't, and how best to organize raids. This would merely be the next level. Would Blizzard be crazy enough to create a PvP-only MMO? Sure! They have carte blanche to do whatever they want, and the resources to fail. But given their 'It's done when it's done' attitude, and their continuing track record of successes, it's probable that they'd find a way to make even this sort of scheme work. And if it did, soon others would copy the gameplay, and boom, a new MMO genre is on hand.
So, does this make a Starcraft MMO seem more, or less likely? There are a bunch of concepts inherent in Starcraft's gameplay that need to be translated to MMO format, or it's not a Starcraft MMO at all. What's the overarching story? Containment of the Zerg in their mindless desire to consume all life? Preventing the Terrans from creating something they can't control using their mad scientific experiments? The Protoss' search for a viable homeworld? What about the hero units, Jim Raynor, Zeratul, and Kerrigan? At a base level, would we just be replacing magic with psi? Time will tell, of course, but if nothing else, these are ideas that will probably appear in some form or other in different places, as the MMO genre matures, tries new tactics, fails, and moves on. Whether it be Starcraft, Diablo, or an entirely new IP, count on Blizzard to be at the forefront of the next wave of innovation.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
spiral-soldier said on 3:17PM 1-25-2008
mmmmm, pvp only starcraft mmo...
/drool
Reply
onetrueping said on 4:16PM 1-25-2008
I'd imagine it being somewhat similar to Tabula Rasa, only with three sides involved. As for character progression, it'd be easy to run with three "classes" per race, with upgradable gear to differentiate between roles for the Protoss and Terrans, and mutations for the Zerg.
Reply
Dacool561 said on 4:20PM 1-25-2008
Didn't they say along time ago that Diablo 3 would definately be a MMO? So couldn't the next-gen mmo blizzard keeps talking about just be Diablo 3?
Reply
Rich said on 5:31PM 1-25-2008
Diablo 3 is Hellgate:London... Most of the Diablo crew left to work on that game. While as cool as MMO Diablo would be I have a feeling their next gen will be Starcraft or a new IP.
Ghen said on 4:46PM 1-25-2008
I want to be an Ultralisk. IMAGINE!
Reply
Seth said on 8:12PM 1-25-2008
I think that the conversion of Starcraft into an MMO would follow the pattern that was set forth by WoW. Many of the classes of WoW were not units. Some were but many not.
My big question would be what would an MMO that relies mostly on ranged attacks would look like. Most units in Starcraft had a ranged attack.
Reply
Aris said on 4:41PM 1-27-2008
I always imagined it might be more like EVE online. Perhaps instead of classes, characters could enlist in one of several branches; infantry, cavalry, (astro)navy... which would give them access to the various machinery and skills associated with those units.
Reply
Matt said on 5:25PM 1-27-2008
i can very easily see them doing what they did to WC to SC. Make certain classes for space combat. very similar to SWG ( one the best MMO's b4 soe destroyed it) make a combat class similar to the zealot, and allow people to use different weapons based on what skills they wanted to use. zealot (tank) marine (ranged dps) Medic (heal bot) but then again that limits the game quite a bit. but you also see the class wyvern rider, or calvary availible in WOW. So the units may not even determine the classes, i might end up alot more like Tabula Rasa or SWG where there was no real tanking class, just different armor sets and healers. will be interesting to see if that is the MMO proposed by blizzard, i mean Activision Blizzard
Reply
gman said on 5:27PM 1-27-2008
It wouldn't make much sense to make a Starcraft MMO, they would be competing against themselves with SC2 already coming out.
They already have a domain for what is currently called Diablo 3. My guess is they are creating an MMO for Diablo or starting something totally new.
Reply
Onikiri said on 6:06PM 1-27-2008
I think Starcraft would highly engender a following but making the game is much easier said then done. As you point out traditional MMO facets don't blend that easily into the Scifi realm. Especially when the focus in Starcraft is more on ranged and constructed units.
This means you have to take the Planetside approach. I think its doable if you add in loot and upgrades. Dungeons and real objectives. But again you still have to make Planetside. And thats not gonna sit terribly well in the long run. Especially considering they haven't pumped out an FPS yet. Once you move to ranged weaponry as a primary then the present MMORPG combat style goes out the window.
The fact they they are making SC2 in and of itself tells us the next MMO from them is gonna either be a new title or be based on the Diablo universe. I think blizzard is too lazy to go for a new property yet so Diablo is where I am and have been putting my money.
Reply
Retro said on 9:05AM 1-28-2008
I think looking at a Starcraft MMO as being "World of Warcraft" with a thick coat of Starcraft paint would be a mistake. While Warcraft started as an RTS title, Warcraft 3 put more emphasis on Roleplaying, exploration, and heros, whereas Starcraft now holds the crown of RTS King.
If you're going to make a Starcraft MMO, make it an MMORTS: Players are not actually on the field of battle themselves, but control their characters like a traditional RTS. As you level, you gain more 'resource points' to build your own army with; do you spend your points on 20 1-point marines, or 4 5-point siege tanks? A combination of marines, firebats, and medics?
Bump up the unit customization by giving each type it's own means for growth and development; because you manage a smaller group of soldiers, you can spend more time developing them, giving them names, promoting them for performance, giving them new skills...
The real treat is when you and 10 of your friends 'raid' together, with your combined forces creating, quite literally, an army.
Reply
Dath said on 3:34PM 1-28-2008
That was sort of the idea I had. You have your small force of elite soldiers and this can be a mix of different skills and classes. The only downside to this that I can see is how to do it without making it extremely multitask intensive.
Naferius said on 8:08PM 1-27-2008
I imagine that, ofcourse the terran wouldnt be just running out killing things to lvl up, but in a sort of sense be like TR where you are sent on missions... for terran maybe you could get sent on scouting/ small infestation removing mission depending on class and other things
Reply
neuromancer2701 said on 8:43PM 1-27-2008
It is all going to depend on SC2. If they follow the Warcraft pattern. They should expand the universe with SC2 like they did with WCIII and continue the story with Universe of Starcraft(USC)
I would think that USC would not come out until a couple years after SC2. You would think in 3-4 years WoW would be on a down turn and USC would be a good replacement so they would not be stealing their own customers.
They may try something crazy and do a rts MMO, who knows but I am looking forward to anything they are going to do.
Reply
Dan said on 8:23AM 2-04-2008
Starcraft MMO would suffer from the same fate as starwars galaxies. You can't apply the medival RPG to every game. It doesn't work. The developers need to get out of the mentality of trying to adopt space based shooters to melee combat RPG's. But if anyone is up to the challenge it's blizzard.
Reply