Lawsuit claims IGE dug too greedily and too deep
Filed under: World of Warcraft, Fantasy, Economy, Events, real-world, Exploits, MMO industry, News items, Legal, Academic, Virtual worlds

Out of sunny Florida comes a storm ready to rain on the parade of gold sellers everywhere. Gold seller IGE has found itself sinking deeper into a stack of complaints thanks to one concerned gamer. Antonio Hernandez is fed up with the spam, inflation, and annoyance that stems from gold selling and has decided to do something about it. He has filed for a class action lawsuit that claims inflation in the virtual economy, thanks to gold sellers, forces players to spend more time behind their keyboard in an attempt to makes virtual ends meet, thus costing them more money. "This loss of time, conservatively, amounts to hundreds of thousands of hours of subscriber time and causes the irreparable harm of driving subscribers away from World of Warcraft."
Since the announcement was made, Antonio has already been flooded with letters of support from the WoW community. The reason for the support is not only because Antonio is trying to end gold selling, but because he is an active member of the virtual community he feels has been wronged. "The lawsuit," says case consultant and professor Greg Lastowka, "has more of a feel of a community trying to enforce its rules rather than a game company trying to enforce its power over the participants." The community is a strong one, and to add to the power players wield, the game companies are taking a stand with them. Blizzard has announced that they support the lawsuit and stated that gold selling is a very serious concern of theirs.
The case dives headfirst into a world with no clearly defined boundaries. The Florida justice system, having issued a subpoena to IGE demanding their transaction details, accepts that the subject of virtual law is real enough for concern. This is a good sign for players since their rights are also what are at stake. As Hernandez's lawyer, C. Richard Newsome, asks, "what are the rights of the [virtual world] community members when they go online?" The community members supporting Antonio have made one thing crystal clear concerning that question. They desire a fair game and hope to collapse IGE's virtual gold mine right on top of IGE's head.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Vort said on 12:43PM 4-08-2008
Good Luck.
Reply
Ghen said on 1:30PM 4-08-2008
This will be interesting. Its always fun to watch the courts wrestle with the idea of virtual property and who owns what.
Reply
Imbalance said on 10:39PM 4-08-2008
While I agree with getting rid of gold farmers, Im afraid this case might set a dangerous precedent. Judical Review in the American government was created by way of a court case. The court deciding that they did in fact have jurisdiction over the WoW economy and could enforce court orders to regulate the economy scares me.
Reply