Linden Lab to license network advertisers in Second Life
Filed under: Culture, Economy, News items, Second Life, Virtual worlds
Jack Linden has dropped the next shoe on mainland policy changes in Second Life, while we're expecting plenty more shoes, this one at least seems to have been widely welcomed, increasing the overall crack-down on what are known colloquially as ad-farms.
The short form is 'Network advertising (Ad Farming) will no longer be permitted on the Linden Mainland unless you have a written agreement with Linden Lab (essentially meaning a license to advertise)', writes Jack. There's additional explanations and caveats to that, though. The last policy post on ad-farms was certainly considerably deficient and seemed to cause more problems than it solved.
Users who are are operating advertising networks that are infringing this policy have until 1 October 2008 to obtain a license and comply with the terms of that license, or to remove their content. Jack does not say what will occur otherwise, but content-removal and account-sanctions are the safe bet.
 |
Are you a part of the most widely-known collaborative virtual environment or keeping a close eye on it? Massively's Second Life coverage keeps you in the loop. |
One of the problems with the last policy is that it generated a lot of false abuse-reports, with people reporting things that the policy did not and was not intended to cover, due to misunderstanding, confusion and ambiguity. This policy has the same inherent problem, but the Lab appears to be intent on addressing consistency of action.
'By Network advertising we are specifically referring to the practice of using many parcels over multiple regions, especially small micro parcels where the predominant purpose of the land is to hold advertising. In the vast majority of cases we believe it will be very clear whether a particular use is a violation or not but we will provide a way for people to appeal and discuss their own case with us before any action is taken. We will assess any edge cases as we encounter them.'
A limited number of advertising licenses will be made available, and the Lab will be deciding what terms, exactly, a licensed advertiser will have to adhere to. It is not known, at this time, if any costs will be involved in obtaining and holding such a license.
There is already some confusion about what forms of advertising are and are not addressed by this policy as evinced by the number of concerned queries we received from users in the hours following the announcement. That confusion will certainly lead to an increased workload of junk abuse-reports come October if it is not made very clear.
An additional concern for false reports would involve recognizing who is and who isn't a licensed advertiser. A licensed advertiser might be falsely reported many times, while an unlicensed advertiser may make attempts to mimic one who is licensed. Relying on end-users to send in abuse reports would seem to be opening a torrent of extra work on an already maxed-out governance team.
Still, the move is apparently widely welcomed and seen as a positive change, as near as we are able to determine. The only question remaining is whether the policy will actually be seriously enforced, or whether it will be largely ineffective, like the weak enforcement of the ban on gambling or banking.
_thumbnail.jpg "Aion Beta: Asmodian Ascension Quest")
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Mike said on 8:41AM 9-05-2008
It's about damned time!
Do you know how happy this will make 99.99% of residents in SL.
Nice!
Reply
Erbo Evans said on 11:16AM 9-05-2008
A move by LL that is way, way, WAY, WAY, WWWAAAYYY overdue. But it's welcome nonetheless.
Reply
Kara Spengler said on 11:46AM 9-05-2008
Now for them to do something about extortion plots in general.
Reply
Jacek Antonelli said on 2:17PM 9-05-2008
I'm looking forward to them announcing that they've built an army of ten thousand cybernetic governance officers to scour the grid and enforce these policies with their cold, metallic fists of objective law.
Reply
Tateru Nino said on 3:01PM 9-05-2008
I suspect the first week of October will be the nastiest and most soul-draining the g-team has ever had.
Nightbird Glineux said on 8:26PM 9-05-2008
*Carrie Fisher voice* I've got a bad feeling about this.
Licensing? What happens when LL starts to see advertising licensing as a profit center?
And how does this effect advertisers at NCI? That's a networked system, isn't it?
Reply
Carl Metropolitan said on 12:03AM 9-06-2008
Nightbird--the policy should not affect NCI. Jack Linden explicitly states that, "By Network advertising we are specifically referring to the practice of using many parcels over multiple regions, especially small micro parcels where the predominant purpose of the land is to hold advertising."
I think we are pretty safe.
However, if it should turn out that this policy will require us to close AdNode, then AdNode goes. The benifit to the general SL community is too great for me to even think of opposing this policy.
NCI can raise the money some other way if we have to. We've done it before--we can do it again.
Reply
TigroSpottystripes Katsu said on 3:07AM 9-06-2008
liek I said on the thread for that, in my opnion they should attack griefing (no matter what means are used to grief, be it shock-site pictures, annoying music or advertisements) instead of attacking the act of advertising itself
Reply