AGDC08: Why 'free to play' doesn't mean free or easy money
Filed under: MapleStory, Business models, Free-to-play, Massively Event Coverage
Min Kim, the presenter of the talk, subtitled this event "A collection of thoughts on building and launching a Free-to-Play MMO." Kim has been around the world and back talking about his company, Nexon, and the business practice they're leading the charge on. Free to play games are bigger than ever in the MMO space, be they local titles like Runescape or imports like Nexon's own MapleStory.As Nexon America's VP of Marketing, Kim generally makes for a compelling speaker. Still, it was hard not to be impressed at the specifics and knowledge he brings to a conversation on this topic. Essentially a guide to putting together a free-to-play business model from scratch, Kim's talk centered around hard-won lessons from the front lines.
Read on for details on everything from the benefits of selling to kids at Target, to the dangers and pitfalls of self-publishing a game.
"Retailers are taking notice of card sales, and support will grow. Retailers love the regular customer, and coming back for cards is a given. Once you've purchased one card, statistics say you'll probably buy another." |
The North American arm of Nexon is huge. The company's revenue went up some 2.5x between 2006 and 2007. Min pins that success on the addition of card sales to stores like Target. This generally reflects Nexon's growth in overseas markets - the company is now something like 50%/50% between Korean and international income.
The meat of Min's talk centers on four trends he's noticed in the online gaming sector.
Trend 1: Demand for Online Entertainment is Growing
Min firmly believes that the PC is making a huge comeback as broadband penetration is increasing and speeds are getting better. MySpace and Facebook are 'sticky', interactive ways to touch base with other people, and players are looking for something to do alongside that. Kids are hooked into Club Penguin, Runescape, NeoPets ... in five years time the teen market will be ready-made for online gaming.
Meanwhile, MapleStory and other titles like Free Realms and Battlefield Heroes are capitalizing on this. Retailers are taking notice of card sales, and support will grow. Retailers love the regular customer, and coming back for cards is a given. Once you've purchased one card, statistics say you'll probably buy another.
Trend 2: Imports are Big Business
Imported products from the East are actually laying the foundation for North American development. Development of free-to-play products in the US has increased, but many products have failed. Fundamentally lots of developers just don't understand the model. Despite the problems with bringing the gameplay/marketing framework here, a few diamonds will ship - primarily native NA developers that adopt Korean concepts.
Trend 3: Free to Play is Misunderstood
"The business of game development isn't selling items, it's in selling social experiences." |
Trend 4: The Battle Between Publishing vs. Self-Publishing
Venture Capitalists are increasingly pressuring developers to self-publish, which means developers are increasingly going outside their core competency. The reason is simple: without involving a publisher, the value of the product the VCs are backing goes up. And hey, it's all just free on the internet, right? Developers are also looking to go global right away. This disregards the challenges of international markets and localization.
Overall, Nexon's games grew because they went past the hardcore gamer motif. They weren't making games for non-gamers, they were aiming specifically at non-core gamers. Kim mentions Combat Arms, noting the success of Korean FPS titles for expanding gaming beyond the hardcore player. "Easy" FPS titles, free to play, will get everyone on board.
First Steps to Developing a Free To Play MMO
"The online/free concept is still very new to most people. Additionally, you might find that players will hesitate and question the value of the title. 'It costs nothing? It must be crap.'" |
Understand the marketplace and who is getting excited by this type of game. If anything, that can help you figure out who isn't currently being targeted. Examine how other people are making their 'shops', how they're handling microtransaction sales. There are lots of examples; just go out and look.
Focus on Fun, not Money and Items
The business of game development isn't selling items, it's in selling social experiences. Have an idea instead of just building out needlessly ahead of time. If players find value in the experience, they'll pay to enhance their gameplay. If the game isn't fun, no one will be left to buy the items.
Don't Use Tollbooths - Tolls Aren't 'Free'
Free to play doesn't imply the concept of Shareware. If you're entering the market, you should be offering the full experience to all players. Additionally, expansions and additional content added to the game should be free. These components are just not where free to play games make their money.
Players shouldn't be locked out of major features or areas of the game. If a player can't experience the full game without paying, they're going to feel pressured by friends to put up money. Don't bombard players to upgrade; ultimately you want the player to want to pay you. Spending money should feel like a positive experience!
Challenges to the Free to Play Concept
"Ultimately proving to the consumer that the product is valuable is entirely about perception. Free to play gaming still isn't recognized as a legitimate platform yet - even if they have 10x the number of customers." |
PR will play a big role in perceived value. Ultimately proving to the consumer that the product is valuable is entirely about perception. Free to play gaming still isn't recognized as a legitimate platform yet - even if they have 10x the number of customers. Media sites are still reluctant to cover free to play games at all, some dismissing them outright as 'not games'. As a requirements, FTP titles must constantly change to keep them competitive. If they're not being updated and tweaked, they'll get stale and players will walk out the front door.
Watch Your Weight and Your Specs
Large clients can kill your playerbase. Most consumers are just not used to large downloads. The perceived value of time vs. cost of the game is a big issue for them. "It's free, so this huge download isn't worth my time." The nature of the game is to grow/expand. Every year it will get bigger, so keeping it small initially will allow you to grow. Clients also cost money to deliver. Deliver a small client just to get the player started, and then stream in additional content to keep them moving.
Graphically intensive doesn't mean better. When you're creating for the mass market, consider the install base and what your minimum spec looks like. Ultimately players judge a game based on how fun it is. If you can get away with 'older' graphics while maintaining a high level of fun, go for it.
Barriers to Play
You don't have to deal with marketing if you don't want to. There's zero cost to the consumer to get in, so everyone can theoretically try your product for themselves. getting to hardcore gamers and a younger audience via word-of-mouth. It sidesteps the problems of credit cards, allowing everyone to play together. The result is that free-to-play gaming is a really aggressive business model, despite the innocuous appearance. It chisels away player investment in for-pay products. Player word of mouth results in viral growth.
Put up a Barrier to Exit
Because it's incredibly easy to get into the game, it's also very easy to get out. Protect the new players coming in, because it's just as easy to leave as it is to join. Have them invest in your game and they'll feel a need to stick with your product. Once you get a player to open up their wallet, they've already committed. Conversely, because the game is free to play, there's no pressure to leave!
Build Your New Player Experience
Most North American players have zero experience with free games online. Min notes his own history visiting relatives in South Korea, playing social games online with friends in PC cafes. American games went in a very different direction, as consoles encouraged players to play by themselves. Without a tutorial, players will leave without giving a new title a chance.
Without PC cafes, there are huge challenges in getting FTP interest to breed in North America. In the US it's about you in your room downloading the game by yourself, hoping it will work. A good tutorial will protect players from the hardcore endgame user. Veteran players will detract from the 'newbie' experience if they're allowed to interfere.
You are creating a Service
These games are not just boxed products. Build strategies to increase duration times, keep people playing. Ultimately the reason people keep playing any game is the other people playing them.





Get a WordPress.com Blog













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
hayt3r said on 4:55PM 9-22-2008
My issue with F2P games is the general lack of quality and periodic content updates seen in major subscription based MMOs. The $10-15 per month really does go a long way towards a more enjoyable gaming experience.
Take Guild Wars for example. While it strictly isn't a F2P game, it is a better quality MMO that doesn't require monthly payments. And without monthly payments, the amount of content is pretty lacking. I own all the expansions for it, but after clearing everything with no new content on the horizon (save for infuriating skill changes), it's hard to continue playing.
Conversely, WoW is where I can always expect new content and activities in between expansions. I just don't play it now because it eats up time :(
So indeed, MMOs also follow the "You get what you pay for" proverb.
Reply