A player's perspective on top ten priorities for WAR in 2009 (updated)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

1-09-2009 @ 10:54PM

Nadril said...

At this point adding in the other four cities would be a complete waste of time and hurt the game. Not only would it take away development from what NEEDS to be fixed (read: the OP's list) but there is no need to split up the battlefield even more so than it already is.

Really though , the list is dead on with the problems WAR has currently. Of course, for some people, (like me) those problems were deal breakers. The lag and lack of fun ORvR made me leave.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.