Massively Features





Our Writers
Shawn Schuster
Editor-in-Chief
Dan O'Halloran
Features Editor
Seraphina Brennan
Editor
Beau Hindman
Contributing Editor
Brendan Drain
Contributing Editor
Eliot Lefebvre
Contributing Editor
Jef Reahard
Contributing Editor
Justin Olivetti
Contributing Editor
Krystalle Voecks
Contributing Editor
Kyle Horner
Contributing Editor
Rubi Bayer
Contributing Editor
Tateru Nino
Contributing Editor
WIN Network
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- Also on AOL
Featured Galleries
Most Commented On (7 days)
- GDC10: Hands-on with Star Wars: The Old Republic (64)
- Bill Roper no longer executive producer of Champions Online, game improvements promised (61)
- The Daily Grind: What do you think of Cryptic? (56)
- GDC10: A chat with Cryptic's Bill Roper and Craig Zinkievich (56)
- Mortal Online to launch this month (48)
- EA: SWTOR is our largest project (35)
- The Daily Grind: What's the most important part of the trinity? (34)
- Derek Smart: big changes in store for Alganon (33)
- Black Prophecy unveils new trailer (29)
- GDC10: An in-depth look at Black Prophecy (29)
AOL Games
© 2010 Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved. Massively is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network.





Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-16-2009 @ 8:17PM
Sean said...
"and the option to pay a small fee of Crowns to get a second chance at a boss drops after defeating the boss."
That crosses a line that I at least am uncomfortable with. These games are already obfuscated slot machines without the developers introducing such a transparent mechanic. Aside from any question of what this means for "balance," does this strike any of you as problematic for a game pitched to a younger audience?
One might draw the analogy to boosters in TCG's, which I also dislike, but in the present case the items are even more ephemeral in value and the "micro" transactions small enough such that it might reinforce an impulsive, gambling response.
Reply